Skip to content

W1 forensics 1: the five transport mechanisms (registration 4951218279)#163

Merged
MaxGhenis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
w1-forensics1
Jul 12, 2026
Merged

W1 forensics 1: the five transport mechanisms (registration 4951218279)#163
MaxGhenis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
w1-forensics1

Conversation

@MaxGhenis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

W1 forensics 1 — the five transport mechanisms

Diagnostic under the FROZEN registration #42 comment 4951218279 (the registration wins). Reported, not gated (reported_not_gated: true); one run; publishes regardless. Measures the five initialization/support/scope mechanisms candidate 1 isolated (grading 4951216895) before candidate 2 designs.

Standard — the gate-2b forensics rounds: instrumentation bit-identity is EXACT (0.0) for every re-simulation of the committed transport_deployment_v1 machinery; the additive decompositions telescope at machine epsilon (all_identity_reconciliations_at_machine_epsilon: true, bar 64·float64_eps). Artifact runs/gate_w1_forensics1_v1.json written via write_new(..., sidecar=True)the first artifact to adopt the #152 env sidecar (.env.json, environment + gates.yaml contract ref).

Q5 — the single most consequential number: C1's non-reversal is ROBUST

Does a realistic earnings tail move PPI past NRA (reverse the C1 fingerprint)? No — robustly, in the conservative direction.

The committed transport draws cell.quantile(u_year) at every career age — always positive, no p0 zero-mass — an upper read on the tail (37.7% of taxable payroll above the cap). The upper read is the heaviest plausible tail, the case most favourable to the PPI↔NRA swap, and even there PPI savings (0.0169) sit far below NRA (0.2023). Applying the certified p0 (the zero/low-earning years the participation dynamics imply, coupling to Q1) lightens the tail (0.377 → 0.370) and moves PPI savings down to 0.0137 — still below NRA (0.2022), the gap widening from −0.185 to −0.189. Transported AIME does not lift PPI past NRA; a realistic tail only pushes it further away. (C2's committed elimination↔+2pp swap holds under both tails — both exceed the ~16.1% break-even.)

The five findings

Q Mechanism Finding (numbers)
Q1 marital never-married-at-18 entry + certified hazards Extending exposure barely helps (mean |b|≈0.028; b turns negative past peak marriage as dissolution offsets marriage); the hazard-level residual dominates (mean |c|≈0.095, in 9/10 cells). Observed-init O == rate_a (the frame's own A_MARITL) is the prohibited regenerated_surface identity → initialization (entry-state seeding), not exposure, is the necessary lever. Refines the pre-registered "initialization dominant" into a sharper mechanism.
Q2 participation boundary gate-1 fits 25–59, no sex covariate Nearest-bin extrapolation clears 0/6 boundary cells; the train-fitted boundary extension clears 4/6 (62–69 participation + the 18–24 profile); the frame's own ages clear all (the identity). 18–24 participation resists — PSID heads/spouses over-state it (0.887) vs the CPS all-person frame (0.642): a coverage delta atop the support gap.
Q3 household scope generator composes adults only; rate_a all-person Scope + composition telescope exactly. Scope is NOT the whole miss. Scope dominates the large-size cells (children collapse them); a large composition residual dominates size-1 (deployed over-produces lone adults even on the adult universe — the same coresidence under-generation as Q1). Contract-consistent fix needs child attachment (certified fertility machinery) and coresidence repair.
Q4 DI level bridge M4 work-disability prevalence vs SSA beneficiary stock GATE-DESIGN finding. The concept delta (duration-accumulated insured-beneficiary stock vs work-disability point-prevalence) dominates (>0.5 share; the 60-FRA gap is +21.3pp duration-concept vs +2.6pp M4 shape). No contract-consistent lever closes it — the concept bridge needs a DI-entry hazard + duration model + an insured denominator the gate never defines and that the DI ASR evidence base doesn't even archive. For the ceremony record, not a candidate lever.
Q5 tail upper read see above C1 non-reversal robust (the consequential number).

c2 design implications

  • Q1 → seed the marital chain's entry state from an initial-state model (not the terminal A_MARITL); the never-married-at-18 entry is the lever, not the certified hazards.
  • Q2 → extend the gate-1 fitted support to the boundary ages and add a sex covariate.
  • Q3 → attach children via the certified fertility machinery + repair adult coresidence; scope alone can't make a candidate scoreable on the locked all-person rate_a.
  • Q4 → do not spend a candidate lever on the family-B DI bands (unreachable without a gate-design concept bridge).
  • Q5 → C1's non-reversal is robust, so C2 (not C1) is the fingerprint the transport moves; don't chase a PPI-over-NRA reversal the conservative-direction argument rules out.

Suite

  • tests/test_gate_w1_forensics1.py17 always-runnable (artifact tier): reconciliations at machine epsilon, decomposition telescoping, the C1-robustness and gate-design invariants.
  • tests/test_gate_w1_forensics1_reproduction.py5 PSID reproduction pins (integration_psid): the marital cube bit-identity, the career-panel bit-identity, observed-init == A_MARITL, the PSID boundary support.
  • Tier manifest refreshed (artifact +17, integration_psid +5), CI-equivalent delta.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Diagnostic (reported_not_gated), one run, publishes regardless. Measures the
five initialization/support/scope mechanisms candidate 1 isolated (grading
4951216895) before candidate 2 designs. Instrumentation bit-identity vs the
committed transport_deployment_v1 machinery is EXACT (0.0) for every
re-simulation; the additive decompositions telescope at machine epsilon.

- Q1 marital: extending exposure barely helps (mean |b|~0.028); the
  hazard-level residual dominates (mean |c|~0.095, 9/10 cells). Observed-init
  == rate_a (the frame's A_MARITL) is the prohibited regenerated_surface
  identity; initialization (entry-state seeding) is the necessary lever.
- Q2 boundary: nearest-bin clears 0/6, the train-fitted boundary extension
  clears 4/6 (62-69 + the 18-24 profile); 18-24 participation resists (PSID
  heads/spouses over-state it vs the CPS all-person frame).
- Q3 scope: scope + composition telescope; scope is NOT the whole miss --
  a large composition residual (size-1 lone-adult over-generation) remains.
- Q4 DI: concept delta (duration-accumulated stock vs work-disability
  point-prevalence) dominates (>0.5 share; 60-FRA +21.3pp duration vs +2.6pp
  M4 shape); insured denominator not even archived. GATE-DESIGN finding.
- Q5 tail: the corrected (p0-inclusive, lighter) tail moves PPI savings DOWN
  (0.0169 -> 0.0137), widening the gap to NRA (0.202); C1 non-reversal is
  ROBUST in the conservative direction. C2's elimination<->+2pp swap holds
  under both tails.

Artifact runs/gate_w1_forensics1_v1.json via write_new(..., sidecar=True) --
the first artifact to adopt the #152 env sidecar (.env.json). Tests: 17
always-runnable + 5 PSID reproduction pins; tier manifest refreshed
(artifact +17, integration_psid +5).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
social-security-model Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 12, 2026 1:47pm

Request Review

@MaxGhenis MaxGhenis merged commit dce90f5 into master Jul 12, 2026
7 checks passed
MaxGhenis added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2026
…by its own evidence (#166)

Carry the paper through every merged wave since the gate-2b pass (#149).

Add the gate-2c candidate ladder and its independently verified pass
(#155/#157, verification 4950580430): two candidates — the shortest of the
family ladders — candidate 1 failing 1/5 with the assortative diagonal held
35/35 on the first attempt and the gate bound entirely on the earnings-blind
first-marriage cells the registration had named in advance, candidate 2's
one marginal-preserving modifier (byte-carry 2,500 cells at 0.0) passing 4/5.
With it, every gate-2 tranche is passed: all four demographic gates locked
AND passed (memo 4950584695).

Add the disability gate (M4): floors #153 (round-1 restoring the occupancy-
stock teeth via mixed-k), lock #159 (the start-wave weight-definition fix),
candidate 1 passing 5/5 (#161) — the program's first five-of-five — verified
with a both-constructions gap adjudication (4951142927), the estimand always
the PSID self-report, never an SSA DI level (seven concept deltas).

Add the transport gate (W1): design #151, floors #154 with the owned #158
tier-manifest process violation, lock #160, candidate 1 failing 0/5 (#162,
C2 swap realised / C1 non-reversal robust / earnings not degenerate),
forensics 1 (#163, the entry-state lever and the Q4 gate-design finding),
and amendment 1 in full ceremony (#164/#165) — the program amending its own
structurally-unpassable gate, all ten family-B cells demoted on committed
evidence with anchors retained verbatim and the failed candidate left failed.
This is the fourth recurring referee class: a gate can itself be wrong, and
the same ceremony catches that too, after the lock.

Add the interim benefit seam (#156: gross $41.35B -> net $36.02B, offsets
enumerated, 4/4 expectations, engine-vs-transport gap 6e-8), stating the
PolicyEngine-executes / Axiom-cross-validates division; and the deployment
infrastructure (contract identity, env sidecars, a generic K=20 evaluator
reproducing the three committed gate verdicts; the household candidate-9
registry port).

Recompute the tally per the paper's conventions: forty-two registered runs
across six gates (13/16/9/2/1/1), thirty-seven failures against five passes,
six gates locked with FIVE ratified amendments (two gate 1, two gate 2, one
transport), ten forensics rounds, six external-anchor replications, and fifty
forecasts registered with forty-nine graded — the one open registration the
transport gate's second candidate. Frozen sections byte-identical.

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant